The SEC censured and fined an accounting firm and its engagement partner for improper audits that caused the client to violate the Advisers Act’s custody rule (206(4)-2). The SEC maintains that the audits failed the independence requirements because the accounting firm prepared the work papers that it audited. The SEC also asserts that the firm delivered an unmodified audit opinion despite knowing about related party transactions. The SEC also charges the firm with failing to meet professional auditing standards because the audit team had limited experience, knowledge and training in SEC requirements. The SEC previously charged the audit firm’s asset management client.
Only retain service providers that have specialized knowledge and experience in asset management. You wouldn’t hire a family physician to perform surgery, so why would you hire a general practice accounting firm to conduct specialized regulatory audits? The same rationale applies to your lawyers, administrators, and compliance consultants.