Home » Compliance Blog » CFTC

Category: CFTC

CFTC Penalties Nearly Triple in Fiscal 2018

 The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the primary commodities and derivatives regulator, imposed nearly $1 Billion in civil monetary penalties, restitution and disgorgement during the fiscal year that ended on September 30.  The CFTC Division of Enforcement imposed $947 Million in penalties, disgorgement and restitution, including $897 Million in civil penalties, a nearly threefold increase over last year’s total.  The CFTC filed 83 enforcement actions, the most since 2012, and imposed $10 Million judgments in 10 cases, a CFTC high water mark.  More than 2/3 of cases charged an individual executive, reflecting the CFTC’s priority to hold individuals accountable in part because it deters others who become “fearful of facing individual punishment.”  The CFTC has also prioritized parallel criminal proceedings, setting enforcement records for the number of cases filed in parallel with criminal prosecutors.

The CFTC’s regulatory sphere has greatly expanded with the emergence of swaps, derivatives, cryptocurrencies, and alternative hedge funds.  The CFTC, like the SEC, has ramped up its enforcement activities to historic levels.

CFTC Imposes $800,000 Fine for CEO’s Outside Fraud

outside-business

The CFTC fined an RIA/CPO $800,000 for failing to stop its CEO from defrauding investors as part of an outside business activity.  The CFTC asserts that the CEO used the firm’s resources, including its email system, trading facilities, and personnel to assist an outside offering fraud involving alleged performance misrepresentations.  The CFTC argues that the respondent became responsible for the CEO’s conduct because the use of firm resources brought his conduct within the scope of his employment.   The firm’s compliance department uncovered the outside activity and questioned the CEO, who took his own life soon thereafter.

OUR TAKE: The CFTC breaks new regulatory ground by connecting use of company facilities as constituting conduct within the scope of employment.  Compli-pros must re-think supervision of outside business activities if the regulators will fine an RIA or CPO for every action taken by a senior executive, many of whom have outside business activities.  Is it better for an executive to use company facilities so that Compliance can monitor OBAs, or should Compliance force all such activities off the company grid?

http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfconvergentorder121916.pdf