Home » clearing

Tag: clearing

SEC Allows Testing of Distributed Ledger System for Securities Settlement

 

The SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets has provided limited period no-action relief to beta test a service that will allow securities clearance using a distributed ledger system.  The 24-month relief would allow the applicant to operate a securities settlement service whereby securities and cash would be represented by digitized securities entitlements that would be exchanged in accordance with the underlying securities transactions.  Without no-action relief, the applicant would have to register as a clearing agency.  The SEC is allowing limited testing of the system without registration so long as the applicant follows strict guidelines that limit use of the system and volume.

The use of distributed ledger technology and digital tokens could revolutionize securities settlement and transfer agency processes.  Securities settlement could happen more quickly with fewer transaction costs.  The SEC (and the applicant) deserve credit for allowing this testing period before requiring full-blown registration. 

Clearing Agency Fined $20 Million for Inadequate Policies and Procedures

 

The sole registered clearing agency for exchange listed option contracts agreed to pay $20 Million in fines to the SEC and the CFTC for failing to adopt and implement reasonable policies and procedures.  The regulators allege that the clearing agency, an SRO designated as a systemically important financial market utility under the Dodd-Frank Act, did not adopt or enforce reasonable policies and procedures related to margin, credit exposure, risk management, and information security.  Also, the firm failed to obtain required approval  for changes in core risk management policies.  In addition to the fines, the respondent agreed to retain an independent compliance auditor and implement a series of board and executive level risk management oversight mechanisms.

The regulators can impose significant fines and penalties for failures to implement required policies and procedures without alleging any underlying loss or harm to investors.  The failure to implement required risk management and compliance policies can itself serve as the predicate for an enforcement action.