Home » research

Tag: research

SEC Proposes New Fund Research Reports

The SEC has proposed a new rule that would allow third party broker-dealers to publish research reports about registered investment companies without having to comply with current performance presentation requirements.  Proposed Rule 139b would allow a broker-dealer that is not affiliated with the fund’s adviser to publish research reports that meet certain presentation requirements even where the broker-dealer participates in the offering.  A similar safe harbor already exists for other issuers.  The SEC seeks comment about whether performance information should be required to comply with Rule 482’s performance presentation requirements currently applicable to fund advertising.

OUR TAKE: We would go a step further and rewrite Rule 482 to allow more flexibility for all fund materials.  Then, the SEC would not have to wrestle with whether to allow different types of fund reports depending on the preparer, which could result in more confusion.


Hedge Fund Misused Inside Information from Affiliate’s Research Department

An investment bank was fined and censured for failing to enforce information barriers between its research department and an affiliated hedge fund managed by the bank’s CEO.  The investment bank maintained policies and procedures related to the misuse of material nonpublic information, including a restricted list applicable to the bank’s employees.  However, the restricted list did not stop the hedge fund from making 126 trades in restricted list securities over a 6-month period.  In response to deficiencies raised during an SEC examination that occurred before the unlawful trading, the hedge fund adopted policies and procedures that applied the restricted list, required physical barriers, instituted email monitoring, and restricted information flow.  The SEC alleges that the hedge fund failed to enforce those policies.

OUR TAKE: Compliance means more than a drafting unused policies and procedures.  It means actually enforcing those policies to prevent unlawful conduct.  This firm likely incurred the enforcement action because it told the SEC that it had fixed the problem by adopting policies and procedures but then ignored implementation.


Best of the Web – September 2016

Best of Web


Welcome to the September 2016 BOTW.  The kids went back to school, and so should we.  Our September BOTW picks focus on the details you must know to become a well-informed professional.  K&L Gates educates on AML, Drinker outlines the FINRA pay-to-play rules, and Ropes & Gray explains California’s new fee disclosure rule. Sadis also teaches a few things about insider trading litigation.  “To create something exceptional, your mindset must be relentlessly focused on the smallest detail.” (Giorgio Armani)


12 AML Obligations Every Broker/Dealer Needs to Know (K&L Gates)



SEC Approves FINRA Pay-to-Play Rules (Drinker Biddle)



California’s New Fee Disclosure Law for Public Pension Plans Investing In Alternative Investment Vehicles (Ropes & Gray)



Cooperman Insider Trading Case Suffers from Same Flaw as SEC’s Loss to Cuban, but is Bolstered by Cooperman Invoking Right Against Self-Incrimination in SEC Testimony (SadisGoldberg)



US Hedge Fund Managers: Accessing Capital and Marketing in Europe (Dechert)



6 Ways Advisors Can Protect Against 401(k) Lawsuits (Market Counsel)



Considerations for Illiquid Managers launching Liquid Strategies (ACA)



Broker-Lite: FINRA Built It, But Will They Come? (Morgan Lewis)



A ‘Magic Perspective’ On Fraud by Sellers in Private Equity Deals (Pepper Hamilton)



New Form ADV: The Impact on Private Fund Advisers (Schulte Roth & Zabel)



Hedge Fund Side Letter Study (Seward & Kissel)



ESMA Report Highlights Funds’ Rising Use – and Potential Impact on Market Stability – of Synthetic Leverage From Derivative Instruments (Kramer Levin)




Strategic Growth for Asset Managers and Single Investor Products (Skadden)



An Overview of ERISA Issues Related to ‘In-House’ Plan Use of Proprietary Products and Services (Groom Law Group)


Hedge Fund Managers Plan Significant Compliance Technology Spending


A KPMG study reports that the overwhelming majority (94%) of hedge fund managers recognize the importance of investing in technology to compete and that compliance is a top reason (90%) to invest in technology.  The report explains: “Given that — in 2013 — we estimated that compliance was costing the industry upwards of US$3 billion per year (and that number has likely risen much higher since), it is not surprising that compliance ranked as a top objective among our respondents.”  The report also explains the importance of technology in the back office where improved data management allows firms “to meet the increased regulatory and investor reporting demands being placed on them.”

OUR TAKE: Technology that organizes and presents data has become a critical element to meet ever-increasing regulatory requirements especially in areas such as personal trading, email review, and investor reporting.  Technology alone, however, is not a regulatory silver bullet.  Firms must still retain top compliance talent who can assess, interpret, and react to the data and then advise senior management on how to proceed.


Compliance Outsourcing Has Doubled in Last 3 Years


A recent survey of registered investment advisers sponsored by WealthManagement.com and LPL Financial reports a significant increase in the number of firms outsourcing compliance and other non-revenue generating functions.  The percentage of firms outsourcing compliance has doubled over the last 3 years.  Nearly 1 in 5 RIAs now outsource compliance, a function deemed to be “necessary, but behind-the-scene activit[y] with less direct linkage to the customer experience.”  Other often-outsourced activities include HR, taxes, and bookkeeping, as advisors become more “focused on the activities that are most critical to their businesses” while “it is getting increasingly efficient to outsource those functions less important to growth and client satisfaction.”

OUR TAKE: Outsourcing compliance has become an accepted practice especially for advisers that don’t have the resources to hire and retain internal compliance talent.  A third party firm brings on-demand knowledge, scale, depth, experience, and independence.